Cem Basman brought this interesting article from Harvard Busines School to my attention: There is a new study out that measures the success of first time entrepreneurs versus repeat entrepreneurs.

Quote:

Successful entrepreneurs in the study had a 34 percent chance of succeeding in their next venture-backed firm, compared with 23 percent for those who previously failed and 22 percent for first-timers.

This is not to say that I am about to start a new venture, but it does make me think ;-)


Whenever I work with web entrepreneurs, the discussion quickly goes onto one point:


What is it that your company does better than anybody else?

In an era with unprecedented low barriers to entry, and where competition is absolutely global, answering this question correctly and then executing on it becomes more important than ever. And it is surprising how easily we are all being drawn away from that.

Take Qype for example: Qype is successful because it only focuses on local reviews. We had to develop a local search for each market, just to make reviewing simple. Qype reviews are easy to find via Google, on your mobile phone. That is what Qype does really well. Whenever we ventured out of this area, for example with local Groups, we found that we just could not focus the same amount of energy into this.

Nearly every great company stands for one thing they do exceptionally well.

  • Doodle.ch is a fantastic example of this. It does one thing extremely well and is being used for just this: Agree on something, mostly a convenient time for a meeting.
  • Facebook is (and will be) successful in essence, because it will continuosly strive to deliver the best product to connect with your friends. Whatever form this may take. And they have the resources to do so.
  • While a BMW is a car like any other, BMW make the experience for people who like driving just better.
  • Ryanair is fantastic at lowering their costs for flights. Even to the point that they seem to only buy new planes in an economic downturn.
  • Many German Mittelstand companies simply turn out the one product and do that better than everyone else, legions of books have been written about this phenomenon.
  • You know if a company stands for something if it does one thing really well. And here I find too many startups trying to do too many things at the same time, becoming mediocre in each one.

    In the old marketing days, this was called a USP, a unique selling proposition. But today you have to live up to it. And that means focusing all your efforts on this one thing.


    Recently I am spending my reduced work hours doing two very different things.

    1. Educate myself on the current status of sustainable entrepreneurship. Meetings with people from NGOs such as Greenpeace, communities dedicated to sustainable or social projects (Utopia, betterplace.de, reset.to) but also Clean Tech funds, startup investors and green entrepreneurs.

    I have given myself some time to see where the biggest lever is for me.

    2. At the same time, I am being approached by quite a few, mostly German, startup CEOs and founders for business advice, and sometimes funding. While I struggle to make coaching a viable business model, and this takes up too much time, the feedback I get for this has been actually extremely rewarding.

    It is amazing how efficient a two hour coaching seems to be when you have just gone through the same questions yourself and often have done the same mistakes just a couple of months before:
    - what is the core of the business?
    - what do you do better than anybody else?
    - who are your customers?
    - how do you acclerate revenue
    - structure of the team
    - where to look for funding
    - what do investors expect?

    While I will be continuing to distill the most effective form of engagement for me with some of these companies,
    I will try and distribute some of my experience via this blog.


    Finally getting to talk to people again. Discussing ideas, market developments, the underlying trends, barriers to entry, business areas worth disrupting and all these things just plain fun for me.

    I will get bored eventually as I prefer to do things instead of talking about doing things, but for the moment I enjoy the conversation. Most of it, at least. People have been trying to drag me into their ventures and ideas and a surprising number of people, even good friends, have pitched business ideas and concepts that are just not for me.

    So, here is what I find interesting:

    (1) Businesses that make life easier for everyone

    When I started working on  TravelChannel in 1998, I wanted to make it easier to book flights. We build the first engine that could compare flights in two totally different pricing mechanisms – the official IATA tarrifs and the so called grey market in one go, enabling people to find the cheapest flight.
    Qype was started from  a similar starting point: If everyone starts telling everyone about their experience in restaurants, butcher shops or dentists, then there will be less bad experiences.

    Bigger examples that fit this category. Google, Flickr, Facebook, you name it.

    (2) Business that make markets more efficient and disrupt the status quo
    The fun being involved in DocMorris, Europe’s largest mail oder pharmacy that delivers prescription drugs and allowes people to save was that it worked against the existing distribution structure with it’s extremely high cost to the public.
    Qype also is ideally positioned to challenge existing near-monopolies like the yellow pages in each market to give local businesses more efficient advertising.
    Other examples that make markets more efficient: Ebay, of course. But also craigslist, hitflip , nestoria and many others.

    (3) Businesses that help us to reduce emissions
    Together most other people on this planet, I am convinced that we are in a massive climate crises ,  and that mainly our carbon emissions are at a suicidal level.
    I am therefore  – like many other entrepreneurs I know – particularly interested in businesses that help us reduce our carbon emissions. This is where I do most my research at the moment.
    So I will try to combine my background – a degree as mechanical engineer -  with my experience in business-to-consumer internet and starting up companies.
    Here I am not alone. Look at people like John Doerr, Shai Agassi, the Google guys with google.org – lot’s of inspiring examples.

    In summary: Useful, disruptive, saving the environment. These are the discussions I enjoy and the businesses I will get involved in.


    If there is one blog post recommended reading today, it is this one from Fred Wilson, who is also an investor in twitter.
    Facebook has just launched something that will position itself really cleverly again at the center of user interaction. I (and everyone else, I guess) believe this will be massive, makes you admire Zuckerberg again. Wilson argues (correctly) for the different user scenarios – private (Facebook) vs really public (Twitter).

    Some more thoughts on this, unsorted yet:

    • Facebook has so much more leverage with it’s user base, that it will attract a huge number of users doing their status updates. So of course, there is a massive threat to Twitter in this.
    • Twitter enables people like Guy Kawasaki or Stephen Fry to reach an audience of several tenthousand people. As a marketing tool, it is fantastic. Hard to imagine this to happen on Facebook.
    • For me, anything that is on Facebook also is relatively public. The massive inherent momentum within Facebook that encourages you to connect with people whom you do not know that well is the reason for that.

    Most importantly: I found, personally, that I do follow the people who matter to me much more closely and “intimately” on Twitter than on Facebook. Nothing to be found here that is not public,  but the unidirectional follow concept of Twitter surprising level of relevance over the “connectedness” of Facebook.


    Global warming is complex. Everyone is repsonsible. Rich and poor.
    I recently stumbled over 350.org, which tries to establish a common goal for everyone.
    We must turn back the concentration of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere to
    350 ppm.
    At the moment we are at 380 ppm.

    Watch the video.

    And follow the action at 350.org.


    I recently visited the techcrunch office in the bay area and was impressed how close to the private life of Michael Arrington techcrunch operates – the office essentially is in his home.

    Yesterday at DLD someone spat on Michael which makes me feel very sad. He also revealed in his blog today that he was threatened by someone to kill him last year, now the spat attack is prompting him to take time off to rethink his approach.

    At the moment, I just which to share this with everyone and express my anger at the guy at DLD – this person belongs to the 800 “chosen” individuals who were allowed to participate.

    We will need to have a discussion about the negative effects of the self exposure that social media allows and encourages us all to do. And we will need to take a stand against anyone who threatens or attacks people who expose themselves.


    Forget the iPhone! Forget Android! – Get an iPod Touch and a 3G card for your Laptop.

    I really love the iPhone. I love the user interface. I love the way Qype Radar works on it. – However: Whether you use iPhone or the new Android G1 (Qype Radar also available) – it is just ridiculous to actually buy them.
    I have several friends who managed to get to a phone bill of close to 1000 Euro – for one month!

    Both iPhone and Android G1 make you download a lot of data. And even more. And yet more. That is why the telecom operators love them. You need a flatrate. In Germany, the cheapest flat rate costs you just 49 Euro / month, that is a whopping 1.200 Euro for the two year contract. That is: if you stay within the boundaries of Germany. Should you opt to use your iPhone abroad, t-mobile will charge you a whopping 1.900 Euro per Gigabyte. (19 cent per 100 KILObyte that means 1,90 Euro per Megabyte).
    And a weekend of surving abroad can get you easily a phone bill of 200 or 400 Euro.

    What is the market price for end user 3G traffic?

    Just one example. Should yo, as I do regularly, travel to the UK, you can now buy from “3″ a starter kit for 99 GBP (roughly 110 Euro, depending how far Sterling has dropped any given day). For this, you can use 12 Gigabyte with a USB stick on a 3G network. With roaming from T-Mobile Germany, you would pay the price of a car for 12 Gigabyte: roughly 24.000 Euro – today in 2009, within Europe!

    The solution for me:

    For phone and mail:I still use my Blackberry. Never uses much data anyway. Unmatched user experience for email.

    For fun, I use the magnificent iPod touch -just compare

    • iPod Touch: 32 M RAM, half the thickness of iPhone, including WIFI: roughly 300 Euro. It is also location aware – not advertised!.  Qype Radar works fine.
    • iPhone for 2 years, 16 M RAM: roughly 1200 Euro for 2 years.

    For mobile Internet, I use a cheap data only plan plan, in Germany from O2, in the UK from three.co.uk.



    As an entrepreneur, however, I do know that the current policy of the European Commission is not enough. We are effectively hindering a whole new web development. This is not only my opinion, just check out what Paul Jozefak, a Hamburg based VC thinks. I wait for the day when the European commission forces the telcos to cut down on data roaming.


    After announcing to bring in a new CEO for Qype, I have been asked about 15 times today:

    What do you do next?

    So what is next?

    I like to believe believe that I will start another company some time in the future.  I always carry a list of between 10 and 15 viable business ideas around. Some get added every month, some deleted. Recently, about one third of the entries in the lists evolves around ideas to reduce the excessive wast of resources that we all engage in. I would really love to do something in that field.

    I also eventually will  continue with some angel investments. Helping entrepreneurs to start is something worth while doing.

    However:

    My first project is to act according to the advice from some good friends with similar experiences:

    Take a couple of months off.


    I recently attended the Techcrunch UK event in December and two guys from two top European VC firms were present. Mike Butcher started a discussion about their recent investments. It turns out that all was in games, and dating.

    Easy money. Easy payback. I do hope sincerely that there still is a market for “useful” stuff. Things that make life easier or more fun, or maybe more green. Daft hope?