I spend quite some time these days coaching friends, former colleagues or fellow entrepreneurs about “what should I do next“. There are some interesting parallels in these discussions. Strikingly, the self-imposed limitations of what people feel they can do constrain people’s choices in an amazing way. And this is true for any income group. Despite the fact that single mom with a low wage job has fewer choices than the millionaire several times over.

I found over time that many people can not simply tell you what they love best. But when you ask people why they are unhappy in their job, it is rarely because they don’t love what they do, but  more often because they feel they can not do things the way they want, or because the someone as a boss who does not value them and their achievements.

In this context, stumbling upon this very inspirational blog post from Cal Newport, author of a study guide, (thanks, Dave Ambrose for the link) has structured my thinking on career achievement amazingly.

Newport quotes work from Edward Deci who found that

“To be happy, your work must fulfill three universal psychological needs: autonomy,competence, and relatedness.

  • Autonomy refers to control over how you fill your time. As Deci puts it, if you have a high degree of autonomy, then “you endorse [your] actions at the highest level of reflection.”
  • Competence refers to mastering unambiguously useful things. As the psychologist Robert White opines, in the wonderfully formal speak of the 1950s academic, humans have a “propensity to have an effect on the environment as well as to attain valued outcomes within it.”
  • Relatedness refers to a feeling of connection to others. As Deci pithily summarizes: “to love and care, and to be loved and cared for.”

So for students, Newport argues that they should find something the really like and then become excellent at it. This will nearly always enable people to find a work environment where they can achieve a great sense of autonomy, competence and relatedness. Newport:

Your love of a subject will grow with your level of competence and autonomy

This also explains why many CEOs are unhappy in their jobs. Even if they are competent, the often suffer from a lack of autonomy. And if you encounter an entrepreneur who is unhappy, you can check with him whether his level of autonomy is where it should be.


Irgendwie hat die VC- und Startup-Szene oft was mystisches. Als ich noch nicht sooo erfahren in Gründungsdingen war, empfand ich es als ganz schönen Hemmschuh, nicht genau bescheid zu wissen, wer wen finanziert.

Damals, 2005, bin ich noch wie wild durch die Republik gereist, um selber die richtigen Angels zu finden. Teilweise auch mit tatkräftiger Unterstützung von b-to-v oder Catcap. Aber ich hatte viel Zeit damit aufgewendet, die ich lieber ins Produkt gesteckt hätte.

Wer sind die Angels? Wer sind die richtigen Ansprechpartner bei den VCs?

Wer mit Wem, Warum?
Von daher finde ich es sehr gut, dass Gründerszene etwas Transparenz in das Thema bringt. Bei der Gründerszene Datenbank sind die Informationen vor allem über Investoren deutlich besser gepflegt. Ich hoffe, dass das Projekt sich so gut weiter entwickelt, wie es gestartet ist. Es gab bislang schon Versuche wie http://www.startupwiki.org, die ich gute Ansätze zeigen, aber die zumindest im Fall Qype nicht so exakt sind. Und in Sachen Investoren oft leer. Also ist die Gründerszene Datenbank ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung.

Bildschirmfoto 2009-11-30 um 15.44.14


Ich bin seit einiger Zeit begeistertes Mitglied der Entrepreneur Organisation (EO). EO ist ein Netzwerk von Unternehmern, die gegenseitig von Einander lernen. Das ganze geht nur auf Einladung, und ist an bestimmte Kriterien gebunden (Mindestumsatz und so weiter). Wer Mitglied werden möchte, kann sich einfach an ein aktives EO Mitglied wenden. Manche EO Veranstaltungen sind auch öffentlich.
»» continue » Veranstaltungshinweis: Entrepreneurship in Hamburg am 19.11.09


Tech Tour is not that well known. It is an association that hosts regular events to expose promising startups to the most important VCs in Europe. The good thing: unlike other events, it is totally free for startups and comes with no strings attached. For every event, 25 companies are invited to present.

My experience with tech tour was quite good. Qype was selected both for past events in Montreux in 2007 and in Berlin in 2008. Following those events, we got quite a few enquiries from VCs we did not know we would appeal to.

To be considered for this year’s Tech Tour Web and Mobility Summit 09 in Montreux on November 18-19, please apply here by September 20, 2009

This year, I am part of the selection committee. Quite eager to see who will be coming.


Es wird viel über Unternehmertum in Deutschland geredet, oder besser gesagt, den Mangel daran. Kürzlich war ich in Berlin auf einem Panel von Techcrunch auf dem neben der allfälligen Frage, “Wie komme ich an
Venture Capital”, auch die Rede auf das Thema Unternehmertum kam.

Markus Berger de Leon von Jamba war es, der das Thema Praktikum aufbrachte. Praktikum ist ja spätestens seit der gleichnamigen Generation ein Schimpfwort. Aber Markus hat Recht: Die meisten erfolgreichen Gründer haben zuvor mindestens ein Praktikum im Startup Umfeld absolviert. Denn man kann lange an der Uni über Entrepreneurship lernen, es geht um unternehmerische Praxis. Während ich dankbar bin für die Management-Erfahrung, die ich durch ein paar Jahre im Konzern erworben habe, hätte es mich extrem weiter gebracht, wenn ich früher auch andere Unternehmer kennen gelernt hätte.

Das Angebot: Entrepreneur Internship Program

Wir bauen – wie im letzten Post angerissen – im Moment drei Startups auf. Jedes der Gründerteams (eines gibt es schon) wird schrittweise Personal aufbauen, aber in der ersten Phase geht es immer auch um um Marktforschung, Business Pläne, Geschäftspartner überzeugen, Web Seiten aufbauen, Produkttests, PR. Es wird Wachstum geben, Entscheidungen, Erfolge und Rückschläge. Dazu viel Detailarbeit. Alles, was zum Unternehmerleben dazu gehört. Im Moment können wir Menschen anbieten, in der spannendsten Phase eines Unternehmens dabei zu sein. Als Praktikant.

Standort ist Hamburg.

Was muss man als Unternehmer lernen?

Man muss als potentieller Gründer lernen, Risiken einzugehen. Im Wettbewerb zu bestehen, das heißt zu siegen, und das bedeutet auch kämpfen. Die Wachstumsschmerzen von Unternehmen zu erleben, ist was ganz anderes, als darüber zu lesen. Die Spannung zu erleben, ob der Kunde zusagt und die Freude über einen gewonnen Auftrag kann man nicht anders erfahren.  Der potentielle Gründer sollte auch sowas wie Durchhaltevermögen erwerben. Auch das geht besser im Praktikum als beim Lesen einer Biographie von Steve Jobs.

Erfahrungswerte

Wenn ich mich an die vielen Leute erinne, die ich als Praktikanten kennen lernte, gibt es eine auffällige Regel: Diejenigen, die Praktikanten in meiner Konzernzeit waren, gingen später als Angestellte in größere Unternehmen. Auch aus Startup-Praktikanten wurden oft Angestellte im selben Unternehmen. Aber überraschend viele Praktikanten und Mitarbeiter, die ich in den Startups kennen gelernt habe, wurden später irgendwann einmal Unternehmer.

Voraussetzungen:

Wir suchen Praktikanten, die mindestens 6 Monate dabei sein wollen.

Wir suchen Menschen, die was bewegen wollen. Mit Geschäftssinn. Menschen, die entscheiden wollen und können. Offen für Neues, im Team arbeiten, wollen. Sich schnell auf neue Situationen einstellen können.
Durchhaltevermögen haben. Lernen wollen. Begeisterungsfähig sind.

  • Studienfächer bevorzugt aus der wirtschaftlichen und technischen Umfeld
  • Bachelor Studenten, die maximal noch 1 Jahr bis zum Abschluss haben
  • Master-Studenten
  • Absolventen, deren Abschluss maximal 2 Jahre zurück liegt
  • Hohe Online Affinität
  • sehr gute akademische Leistungen
  • Unternehmergeist
  • hervorragende Englisch-Kenntnisse

Tipps zur Bewerbung bei uns

  • Nur bewerben, wenn Ihr die Kriterien oben wirklich erfüllt.
  • Nur bewerben, wenn das Praktikum in den nächsten 6 Monaten starten kann.
  • Engagement zeigen.
  • Nach der Bewerbungsmail erreichbar sein.
  • Die Email-Adresse für Bewerbungen ist mein Nachname bei googlemail.

I deliberately took a while while to decide how I want to work and where to get involved. I pondered to join a VC (too far away from the business) and looked at direct investments in other people’s ideas (sometimes felt I could come up with better ones myself). I enjoyed the last couple of months with discussions with fellow entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and would be founders and now it is time for the next steps.

I said that I would only be interested in businesses which make life easier for everyone, make markets more efficient and disrupt the status quo; or help reduce emissions.

So here is the news:

We have identified several business concepts that fit the abovementioned criteria. True to what I said earlier, neither of them will involve dating or gambling. None of the concepts is a clone of something that works somewhere else, so there is considerable risk involved, but also ample opportunity.

For all businesses, we will be looking for entrepreneurs to launch and manage them. They will be able to count on input and advice, and will get enough freedom to run their businesses. And they will get reasonable shares to make them real entrepreneurs. Upspring will provide ideas, know how, infrastructure and seed funding.

So from now on, we will be scouting the market for real founders with

  • great business accumen,
  • team spirit,
  • lot’s of potential
  • at least 2, but no more than 5 years of job experience.
  • An excellent business education
  • and demonstrated entrepreneurial skills.

Locations will be Hamburg and Berlin. Do contact me via xing if you know of someone. If you want to apply, send a CV via Xing.


I have heard this so many times recently, so it is quite refreshing to read this article by some VCs: The real reasons why people do not get funding. Rarely told. (Thanks to Paul Jozefak for the link).


Cem Basman brought this interesting article from Harvard Busines School to my attention: There is a new study out that measures the success of first time entrepreneurs versus repeat entrepreneurs.

Quote:

Successful entrepreneurs in the study had a 34 percent chance of succeeding in their next venture-backed firm, compared with 23 percent for those who previously failed and 22 percent for first-timers.

This is not to say that I am about to start a new venture, but it does make me think ;-)


Whenever I work with web entrepreneurs, the discussion quickly goes onto one point:


What is it that your company does better than anybody else?

In an era with unprecedented low barriers to entry, and where competition is absolutely global, answering this question correctly and then executing on it becomes more important than ever. And it is surprising how easily we are all being drawn away from that.

Take Qype for example: Qype is successful because it only focuses on local reviews. We had to develop a local search for each market, just to make reviewing simple. Qype reviews are easy to find via Google, on your mobile phone. That is what Qype does really well. Whenever we ventured out of this area, for example with local Groups, we found that we just could not focus the same amount of energy into this.

Nearly every great company stands for one thing they do exceptionally well.

  • Doodle.ch is a fantastic example of this. It does one thing extremely well and is being used for just this: Agree on something, mostly a convenient time for a meeting.
  • Facebook is (and will be) successful in essence, because it will continuosly strive to deliver the best product to connect with your friends. Whatever form this may take. And they have the resources to do so.
  • While a BMW is a car like any other, BMW make the experience for people who like driving just better.
  • Ryanair is fantastic at lowering their costs for flights. Even to the point that they seem to only buy new planes in an economic downturn.
  • Many German Mittelstand companies simply turn out the one product and do that better than everyone else, legions of books have been written about this phenomenon.
  • You know if a company stands for something if it does one thing really well. And here I find too many startups trying to do too many things at the same time, becoming mediocre in each one.

    In the old marketing days, this was called a USP, a unique selling proposition. But today you have to live up to it. And that means focusing all your efforts on this one thing.


    Recently I am spending my reduced work hours doing two very different things.

    1. Educate myself on the current status of sustainable entrepreneurship. Meetings with people from NGOs such as Greenpeace, communities dedicated to sustainable or social projects (Utopia, betterplace.de, reset.to) but also Clean Tech funds, startup investors and green entrepreneurs.

    I have given myself some time to see where the biggest lever is for me.

    2. At the same time, I am being approached by quite a few, mostly German, startup CEOs and founders for business advice, and sometimes funding. While I struggle to make coaching a viable business model, and this takes up too much time, the feedback I get for this has been actually extremely rewarding.

    It is amazing how efficient a two hour coaching seems to be when you have just gone through the same questions yourself and often have done the same mistakes just a couple of months before:
    - what is the core of the business?
    - what do you do better than anybody else?
    - who are your customers?
    - how do you acclerate revenue
    - structure of the team
    - where to look for funding
    - what do investors expect?

    While I will be continuing to distill the most effective form of engagement for me with some of these companies,
    I will try and distribute some of my experience via this blog.